A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
A Secret Weapon For difference between executive and non executive directors case laws
Blog Article
لاہور ہائیکورٹ نے قرار دیا ہے کہ پاکستان میں لوگوں کو جھوٹے مقدمات میں ملوث کر دینے کی شکایت عام ہے عدالت نے حکم جاری کیا ہے................
“The evidence regarding wajtakkar and extra-judicial confession being relied upon via the prosecution against the petitioner and his above mentioned co-accused namely Hussain Bakhsh has already been opined because of the Lahore High Court, Lahore in its order dated two-12-2010 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No.
This Court may interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer in the fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding arrived at from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. In case the conclusion or finding is like no reasonable person would have ever achieved, the Court may interfere with the conclusion or perhaps the finding and mould the relief to make it ideal into the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority would be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-appreciate the evidence or the nature of punishment. To the aforesaid proposition, we are fortified from the decision on the Supreme Court during the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Source: Order: Downloads 252 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
Some bodies are presented statutory powers to issue advice with persuasive authority or similar statutory effect, like the Highway Code.
Because of their position between The 2 main systems of regulation, these types of legal systems are sometimes referred to as blended systems of legislation.
four. It goes without indicating that observations made hereinabove are only tentative in nature and strictly confined to your disposal of instantaneous bail petition.
only to the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only about the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)
Binding Precedent – A rule or principle proven by a court, which other courts are obligated to observe.
9. Needless to mention that any observations made in the above order are tentative in nature and shall not influence the trial Court.
This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of likely health risks and dangers.
The death penalty, also known as capital punishment, is the most severe form of punishment for murder under Section 302. It requires the execution of your convicted person as being a consequence of their crime.
three. Rule of Regulation: The court reiterated the importance of upholding the rule of law and making sure that all institutions function within their constitutional mandates.
Pakistan’s legal system will not be without flaws: overhauling is overdue as well as regulation regarding murder necessitates get more info major reconsideration and clarification. With the time being, the the very least that can be carried out is to be certain that the First Investigation Report (FIR) is registered with honesty and after properly ascertaining the facts.